<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Change Technically on mcjones.ca</title>
		<link>https://mcjones.ca/categories/change-technically/</link>
		<description>Recent content in Change Technically on mcjones.ca</description>
		<generator>Hugo</generator>
		<language>en-ca</language>
		
			<managingEditor>chealion@chealion.ca (Micheal Jones)</managingEditor>
		
		
			<webMaster>chealion@chealion.ca (Micheal Jones)</webMaster>
		
		
		
			<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2026 22:07:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		
			<atom:link href="https://mcjones.ca/categories/change-technically/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
			<item>
				<title>Change, Technically - Math is for girls</title>
				<link>https://mcjones.ca/docs/change-technically---math-is-for-girls/</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 01:22:27 +0000</pubDate><author>chealion@chealion.ca (Micheal Jones)</author>
				<guid>https://mcjones.ca/docs/change-technically---math-is-for-girls/</guid>
				<description>&lt;h1 id=&#34;change-technically---math-is-for-girls&#34;&gt;Change, Technically - Math is for girls&lt;/h1&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;TIL &lt;a href=&#34;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motte-and-bailey_fallacy&#34;&gt;Motte and Bailey&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;  &lt;blockquote&gt;&#xA;    &lt;p&gt;a form of argument and an informal fallacy where an arguer conflates two positions that share similarities: one modest and easy to defend (the &amp;ldquo;motte&amp;rdquo;) and one much more controversial and harder to defend (the &amp;ldquo;bailey&amp;rdquo;)&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&#xA;  &lt;/blockquote&gt;&#xA;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;14:00&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;  &lt;blockquote&gt;&#xA;    &lt;p&gt;I think he even said to me, I don&amp;rsquo;t want to believe that this is true, but it&amp;rsquo;s like pages and pages of evidence. And to me, of course, I was like, 0 my gosh, you think that&amp;rsquo;s pages of evidence?&#xA;I have evidence from 1000000s of students and years of work comparing culture and years of education that says the opposite, but of course, you don&amp;rsquo;t know that.&#xA;And to you, this small, tiny, sort of distorted, weird study that&amp;rsquo;s actually crappy evidence looks super impressive. But you don&amp;rsquo;t know how rigorous and great all the research is on our side and on the side of, you know, appreciating the diversity of human potential.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&#xA;  &lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
